Tuesday, January 06, 2026

Are We Dealing With Chronic Exposure To Elevated Levels Of Radiation?

 

We Have No Choice: Blood Strengthening Strategies in the Age of COVID

By J. Nayer Hardin, CURE / Computer Underground Railroad Enterprises
Final Draft for Discussion Purposes — January 2026
ChatGPT Overview

Purpose

This research was developed to address a growing public-health gap: the lack of cumulative-exposure standards and biological modeling for chronic multi-source electromagnetic field (EMF/RF) environments, particularly as next-generation wireless systems (including planned 6G millimeter-wave and terahertz bands) are layered onto already saturated electromagnetic landscapes.

Current regulatory frameworks primarily evaluate single-source, short-term, thermal-threshold exposures. This work examines chronic, low-intensity, multi-source exposure environments and their potential interaction with vascular, neurological, and immune systems.

Core Findings

The manuscript compiles peer-reviewed research and environmental measurements demonstrating:

• Chronic RF-EMF exposure can induce oxidative stress, calcium channel dysregulation, endothelial injury, microcirculatory disturbance, neuroinflammatory signaling, and altered red-blood-cell behavior — often below existing thermal safety thresholds.

• Modern populations experience continuous background exposure from overlapping sources (Wi-Fi, cellular infrastructure, smart meters, IoT, Bluetooth, power wiring, broadcast towers), creating a stacked exposure matrix rather than isolated exposures.

• Vulnerable populations (elderly, cardiovascular, neurological, inflammatory, autoimmune, and stress-burdened individuals) may exhibit heightened biological sensitivity to cumulative EMF load.

• COVID-19 autopsy findings (microvascular clotting, endothelial inflammation, circulatory injury) reveal biological pathways that overlap mechanistically with EMF-linked endothelial stress and oxidative injury, warranting further investigation.

Key Public-Health Concern

Existing exposure standards do not account for:

• Cumulative lifetime exposure
• Multi-source environmental stacking
• Continuous background saturation
• Vulnerable sub-population sensitivity
• Non-thermal biological stress mechanisms

As wireless density increases and 6G planning advances into higher frequency ranges, these omissions represent a growing systemic public-health blind spot.

Requested Consideration

The author respectfully requests that this research be:

• Routed for scientific review within EMF health evaluation bodies
• Considered in future cumulative-exposure modeling and guideline development
• Included in research prioritization for millimeter-wave / terahertz biological interaction studies
• Evaluated for implications to precautionary public-health policy

Proposed Research Directions

• Cumulative exposure modeling (multi-source, multi-band, continuous background)
• Long-term endothelial and neurovascular monitoring studies
• Vulnerability profiling (cardiovascular, neurological, pediatric, elderly populations)
• Updated biological safety benchmarks beyond thermal thresholds

Please post your thoughts and recommendations
in the comments below.

No comments: